Tag Archives: SOLO Taxonomy

Letter to a Friend

One of the best, and worse, things about studying for my MA Education is the amount of reading I have to complete. Whenever I take the time to read something that is not related to education, I feel guilty.

‘Shouldn’t I be reading something for work?’

My MA reading has been a blessing though, as it has led to the discovery of some exciting ideas that I hope to develop in my classroom.

One of these ideas has been the concept of the ‘Letter to a Friend’ (L2F). ‘Letter to a Friend’ was used by Keith Trigwell and Michael Prosser to assess students at the end of a unit of study. In their work, Trigwell and Prosser used the letters written by their first year nursing students to assess their depth of understanding of the unit. (Trigwell & Prosser, 1991).

I decided to start using an adapted version of the L2F idea as a means to judge progress across a topic.

I asked pupils to write two letters per topic; one before the start of the topic, and one at the end. Before we started the topic as a class, I showed pupils a quick video that served as an introduction to some of the concepts/questions that we will be studying. I created the video by collecting appropriate clips from YouTube and stitching them together using video editing software. I then asked pupils to write a letter to a friend (real or imaginary!) that described what knowledge they already had about the concepts/questions that were going to be studied. I marked the letter using SOLO taxonomy and gave pupils back the letter and feedback to refer to throughout the topic. Pupils were also asked to write another letter at the end of the topic, this time detailing how their knowledge of the topic had developed. This ‘end-of-topic’ letter was again marked using SOLO taxonomy.

Although the primary objective of the ‘L2F’ task is to assess progress across a topic, the task also provides an opportunity for pupils to practise writing in extended prose. These literacy opportunities can be difficult to come by, especially in my subject, Science. When providing feedback to pupils there was equal importance placed on getting the Science right and having correct spelling, punctuation and grammar. With the introduction of the extended writing questions in the Science GCSE exams, the L2F task is an important opportunity for pupils to really hone their literacy skills.

I used the L2F strategy for two units with a Year 10 Triple Science GCSE class. On the whole I found it to be an incredibly useful experience.

A major advantage of the strategy was that the ‘start-of-topic’ letter enabled me to identify pupil misconceptions about particular scientific concepts. This really informed my planning for the rest of the unit.

The letters were also a useful revision resource for pupils. Pupils valued the letters as immediate and detailed indicators of the progress that they had made throughout the unit.

The videos I made and showed pupils before the topic began where useful in engaging pupils with the subject knowledge. They provided an opportunity to demonstrate the wider relevance of the topic to pupils.

Upon reflection  I felt that there were a number of issues with the L2F strategy that need to be addressed before I start using it with more classes.

  1. The marking load with this strategy is very heavy. The ‘end-of-topic’ letter often coincided with the topic summative assessment which served to further increase the work.
  2. The task itself did take time for pupils to complete. Depending on the circumstances at the time, I tried to plan the task so that the pupils completed the letters for homework. This was not always possible, and some pupils did find it difficult to complete their letters during class time.

Despite the issues described, I do believe that the advantages of this strategy mean that it warrants further exploration. I intend on using the strategy with more of my classes, however there are some areas that I would like to develop/improve further:

  • I would like to make this strategy one that requires minimum effort, from a teachers perspective,  but has maximum impact. As a result I know the issues surrounding the marking of the letters need to be addressed. I would like to develop the use of peer assessment with this strategy, but this will require pupils to be trained in the art of providing positive and informative feedback! This wont get rid of the marking issue and so I will need to investigate this further.
  • By using this strategy with more classes, especially with mixed ability KS3 (Years 7-9) classes, I will need to think carefully about differentiation. Many pupils will find the idea of writing an extended piece of prose incredibly daunting. I will be considering the use of writing frames for some pupils and I will need to investigate further strategies that ensure the task is accessible to all.
  • I would like to explore the possibility of pupils using blogs to write their letters. I would like to investigate how the use of blogging could affect pupil engagement with the task. I would also anticipate that by using commenting facilities on blogs, pupils could assess each others work and understanding of the scientific concepts.
  • Finally, I would like to work with the English department in my school to see how the Letter to a Friend strategy could be improved. There will be a wealth of expertise available in the department that I haven’t made use of yet, and it would be stupid of me not to tap in to that. As a Science teacher I am not incredibly comfortable when it comes to teaching literacy skills, and so working with the English department could really help to improve my confidence.

I have presented the above ideas to various people, most recently at the York Tweetup (#YorkTU – the presentation used can be seen below) and have received some positive comments, but I am really keen to hear from more people who think that they can offer some feedback – positive or otherwise!

References:

Trigwell, K. & Prosser, M. (1991) Relating approaches to study and quality of learning outcomes at the course level, The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61 pp. 265-275.

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

The Compton ASE TeachMeet

Last week I had the pleasure of hosting a TeachMeet at the school in which I currently work. It was a TeachMeet with a twist – an exclusive event limited to Science teachers! We had a small but engaged crowd attend, and there were representatives from StemNet and the Royal Society of Chemistry.

Despite the difficulties in publicising the event, and in attracting presenters and lurkers, it was fantastic to see a buzz of conversation at the end of the night. Everyone involved hopefully left with at least one worthwhile idea they would like to use in their own classrooms.

I have included below the three main presentations delivered on the night:

‘An NQT’s Wishlist’ was delivered by S. Groves & C. Davis. This was a great presentation from two excellent teachers coming to the end of their NQT year. It gave plenty of food for thought and is definitely a presentation that is going to be widely shared:

J. Hancock delivered a brilliant presentation giving an introduction to the rewards/sanctions system Class Dojo:

The beginning of the evening was kicked of by yours truly. I delivered a short introduction to SOLO Taxonomy…

I would thoroughly recommend teachers either attend or host a TeachMeet. Whether it be subject-specific or a general TeachMeet, they are great opportunities to pick up new ideas and network with like-minded colleagues. To find out more information about TeachMeets visit the TeachMeets Website.

Thank you to Frances Evans from the ASE (francesevans@ase.org.uk) for her help in organising and hosting the ASE TeachMeet at The Compton School.

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Displays For Learning

We plan many things to ensure that for the time that a class is in front of us learning can occur. We plan the questions that we will ask to probe pupils’ understanding. We plan activities, seating plans, starters and plenaries. We try to plan as much as we can so that we can provide the best learning experience that we can for the pupils in our care. At the beginning of my career there was one aspect of the learning experience that I very rarely planned or even considered at all; the environment in which that learning experience took place.

It wasn’t until I started working in my current school, just under two years ago, that I discovered the delights of creating displays. The school where I work, a  converter academy in North London, has a fairly strict policy with regards to classroom and corridor displays:

  • Displays MUST be changed at least once a year – normally in time for open evening every October.
  • Displays SHOULD NOT contain pupils work.
  • Displays should be linked to particular areas of the curriculum. Displays should be focused on particular elements of the subject or pedagogy.
Displays are checked by SLT every year and amendments can be ‘suggested’. There are also prizes given to departments and individuals who produce the most creative, innovative and interesting displays.
Above is a picture of the first display I created. It took up one of the spots on the Science department corridor. It took me HOURS to think of an idea, plan, draw put the display up. It may seem incredibly silly but I was so incredibly proud of the display. My very first! I even managed to sneak in a picture of one of my idols – Eddie Vedder, the lead singer of Pearl Jam.
Like all displays in the school, the purpose of the display wasn’t just to brighten up the corridor, but to help pupils learn. With my ‘Energy is Everywhere’ display pupils had to find an example of each energy transfer from the fairground scene pictured.
Having talked to many teacher friends about the display policy in my school, many often reel back in horror at the thought of spending so much time creating displays and being under so much pressure to create high quality displays. At the beginning of the academic year there are plenty of grumbles about the hours that staff have to spend preparing and putting up displays. Of all the things a teacher has to do in September, sometimes stapling large pieces of coloured card to the wall doesn’t seem the best use of your time. I have however grown to love the process of designing, preparing and putting up displays.
 Below are some of the displays that I have created this year.
This display has two purposes. It is placed at the front of the room. The section where you can see the word REVISION is the ‘Keywords’ part of the display. A word goes on the board every lesson. The word can be used in many ways. Sometimes, as a plenary, pupils are asked to define the word. They can be asked to write a summary of what they have learnt making sure they include the keyword in their summary. Sometimes pupils themselves decide what the keyword of the lesson has been. The aim is to, in a small way, highlight the importance of literacy in our learning.
The traffic light colours are glued on to boxes which have been fixed on to the wall. I use these often to gauge pupils understanding. Each pupil in my classes has a lollipop stick with their name on. I use the sticks as part of the ‘hands-down’ approach I often take with questioning in lessons. Sometimes I will give pupils their sticks before they leave the class, and they place their stick in the box that best represents how well they feel they have achieved the learning objectives. I can then use their feedback to plan the next lesson.
The ‘Science Wordsearch’ display contains individual letter cards that are fixed on to the wall using velcro. The letters can be taken off and moved in to different positions. They can also be used with the keyword section of the display described above. I use this display in revision lessons to highlight topic keywords. Pupils have sometimes built their own wordsearch to test their colleagues.
Below is a picture of our ‘Science Question time’ display. This was designed as an engaging way for pupils to think about Science outside of normal lesson time (registration/tutor time etc.). There are a number of questions on the display including, ‘ Will we ever have an invisibility cloak like Harry Potter has?’. The answers to each question has to be found in various random areas of the classroom.

Above is the display I am most proud of, partly because it drives much of what I am working on in my own practice at the moment. The SOLO display was inspired by blog posts written by Tait Coles. It is a constant visual reminder to pupils of the principles underpinning the taxonomy. It also attracts the attention of other teachers who don’t have knowledge of SOLO and is a good way to get people ‘hooked in’ to the SOLO ‘army’!
I love the creativity of the process of making displays. Most of all I love the fact that every year I will work hard to try to make my laboratory a welcoming, inspiring and productive learning environment. I truly believe that the displays I have created help, in a small way, to improve the learning that places place in my lessons.
Tagged , , , , , ,

Going SOLO! (Part 2) – A Plea for Help.

So I have been ‘Going SOLO’ for a few months now. After introducing the concept to one class initially (see previous ‘Going SOLO!’ post) I have continued my reading and started to develop ideas as to how I will embed SOLO in to my schemes of work.

My exploration of SOLO taxonomy has coincided nicely with the start of the second year of the MA Education course. The second year of the course is entitled ‘Action Research for School Improvement’. I am keen to use my SOLO work as the basis for my action research. The provisional title of the research I am planning is:

‘An investigation into the impact of the use of SOLO taxonomy as a teaching and learning model on the learning experience of pupils’.

This is a deliberately broad title. I aim to focus on how the use of SOLO impacts on pupil engagement and pupil perception of their own ability. There are a number of aspects of the research I still need to investigate and plan but I hope to get underway soon!

So here comes the plea for help! Part of the research will involve looking at how SOLO can be used in subjects other than my own (Science!). I am looking for people who are either currently using SOLO taxonomy with one or more of their classes, or are thinking of introducing SOLO to a class. Once the final design of the research has been finalised, I would hope to work with a few other teachers on collecting some data. Anyone willing to offer some help will use SOLO in any way that they think is best with their own classes. For my research I would just need some information on how SOLO was introduced to pupils and how it is regularly used. I would also require pupils to complete questionnaires about their experiences of using SOLO.

I am hoping that this research could be refined and published at a later date so that the SOLO model can be used by more teachers. I really see this as a collaborative project with other teachers rather than MY work for my MA!

So…if you think you could help, or know of anyone else who would be interested, it would be great to hear from you. You can contact me via twitter (@sciteachcremin) or by emailing me: dwcremin@gmail.com.

For an introduction to SOLO check out the following AMAZING resources I have been using:

SOLO in English - Lisa Jane Ashes

SOLO expert! – Tait Coles

SOLO oracle – Pam Hook

 

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Going SOLO! (Part 1)

For some time now I have been unhappy with how I assess the progress of my pupils in lessons. I have tried and tested various techniques including level ladders (KS3), ‘traffic lighting’ and have for a long time grappled with Bloom’s Taxonomy. Bloom’s in particular was enthusiastically pushed in the schools I have worked in since I started teaching 5 years ago. As much as I persevered with Bloom’s I found it incredibly clumsy and unwieldy. Admittedly, many of these issues may have been due to my lack of concrete understanding of the thinking behind the taxonomy. My biggest issue however, was the fact that the language of Bloom’s was not one that my pupils and I could easily converse in!

After the umpteenth observation in my current workplace in which it was remarked that my formative assessment was ‘Good’  but not ‘Outstanding’, I turned to Twitter for help. It was through the excellent Tait Coles (@Totallywired77) that I learnt about SOLO Taxonomy. After reading Tait’s fantastic posts I decided to give SOLO a go. Rather than go in to depth about what SOLO Taxonomy, here is the link to Tait’s blog – have a read yourself!

I followed Tait’s introductory lesson plan (which can be found HERE) to introduce pupils to the idea and concept of SOLO taxonomy. Surprisingly, the requirements to move from each level of learning and thinking were easily grasped by the pupils. At the end of the lesson I also gave pupils an opportunity to decide how the language of SOLO (in particular the title of each level of learning; Prestructural, Unistructural, Multistructural, Relational and Extended Abstract) could be changed to something more ‘pupil friendly’. Pupils worked in small groups to come up with a better way to describe each level of learning only to conclude that they couldn’t. As a class we had decided that in fact the language was easy to remember, use and understand.

At the end of the introductory lesson, pupils were set an open-ended homework task to produce something that demonstrated what they had learnt in the topic that we had just completed (C2 – Material Choices, 21st Century GCSE). Pupil’s had a week to complete the work and produced some fantastic pieces of evidence. Once the work had been handed in, pupils were given a lesson to work in small groups to mark each others work using SOLO. Pupils had to provide feedback of how the work they were reading had reached each particular level of learning, or how the work could move on to the next level of learning and thinking. Below is some footage of the pupils working on this peer assessment task.

At the end of the lesson I asked all pupils how useful they found the lesson. I was amazed to hear some of the insightful comments they made. The general theme running through most pupils comments was that the taxonomy allowed them to see what ‘real learning was meant to be’. It enabled them to focus on the idea that learning was more than just about learning a set of facts. Pupils were beginning to differentiate between surface and deep learning.

This first experience of SOLO with this class was an incredibly positive one, both for pupils and for myself. It has enabled us to think more clearly, not just about what we are learning, but how we are learning too. It is also enabling us to have meaningful conversations in class about our learning and the progress we are making. The language of SOLO is one that has proved to be easily used by pupils. In the short time we have used the SOLO language I have seen a real improvement in the confidence of pupils. They have truly begun to take responsibility of their learning.

So what next? I still class myself as a complete amateur when it comes to SOLO. There is so much more that I need to read and discover about how SOLO can be used. I am planning to do a SOLO display in my lab so that when I start introducing it to my other classes there is a constant reminder of the language, diagrams etc. I am hoping to broaden the use of SOLO within my teaching to encompass more than just marking criteria and eventually I would like to embed SOLO in to our schemes of work.

I feel incredibly confident about the ability of SOLO to improve my own learning and that of my pupils. It is the most accessible model of learning I have come across since entering the teaching profession and I do believe that the positive results I have seen so far are just the beginning.

For more information about SOLO go to Tait Cole’s blog HERE or the Hooked on Thinking website (click on the image below!).

Tagged , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 29 other followers